Quadro P520 Max-Q vs RTX A500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking309not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.13no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGA107GP108
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date10 November 2021 (3 years ago)23 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048384
Core clock speed1440 MHz1303 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate113.335.83
Floating-point processing power7.25 TFLOPS1.147 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6424
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s44 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.66.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2021 23 May 2019
Chip lithography 8 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 18 Watt

RTX A500 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

P520 Max-Q, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A500 and Quadro P520 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A500 is a workstation card while Quadro P520 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Max-Q
Quadro P520 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 137 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Quadro P520 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.