Radeon Instinct MI200 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking16not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.82no data
Power efficiency16.74no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameAD102Aldebaran
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 December 2022 (1 year ago)December 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores181766656
Core clock speed915 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2505 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate1,423707.2
Floating-point processing power91.06 TFLOPS22.63 TFLOPS
ROPs192no data
TMUs568416
Tensor Cores568no data
Ray Tracing Cores142no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount48 GB64 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth960.0 GB/s1,638 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm

RTX 6000 Ada Generation has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Instinct MI200, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between RTX 6000 Ada Generation and Radeon Instinct MI200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
AMD Radeon Instinct MI200
Radeon Instinct MI200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 77 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.