Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX A2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 and Radeon PRO W7700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A2000
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
35.54

PRO W7700 outperforms RTX A2000 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13941
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation85.9966.45
Power efficiency34.8121.03
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA106Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 August 2021 (3 years ago)13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX A2000 has 29% better value for money than PRO W7700.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33283072
Core clock speed562 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate124.8499.2
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs104192
Tensor Cores104no data
Ray Tracing Cores2648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length167 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A2000 35.54
PRO W7700 58.28
+64%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A2000 13695
PRO W7700 22456
+64%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD94
−59.6%
150−160
+59.6%
1440p44
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
4K28
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.786.66
1440p10.2014.27
4K16.0422.20

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.54 58.28
Recency 10 August 2021 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 190 Watt

RTX A2000 has 171.4% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 64% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 577 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.