RTX A2000 vs Radeon Pro VII

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Instinct MI50 Radeon Instinct MI60 Radeon Pro V420 Radeon Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II Duo Radeon Pro VII
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX A1000 RTX A2000 RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A4000 RTX A4000H RTX A4500 RTX A5000 RTX A5000-8Q RTX A5000-12Q RTX A5500

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro VII and RTX A2000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro VII
2020
16 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
33.54

RTX A2000 outperforms Pro VII by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro VII Pro VII
RTX A2000 RTX A2000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking168147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.5693.82
Power efficiency9.2034.62
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega 20GA106
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)10 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,899 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX A2000 has 434% better value for money than Pro VII.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38403328
Core clock speed1400 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate408.0124.8
Floating-point processing power13.06 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs240104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length305 mm167 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro VII 33.54
RTX A2000 35.35
+5.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro VII 12890
RTX A2000 13586
+5.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
−6.7%
96
+6.7%
1440p40−45
−7.5%
43
+7.5%
4K24−27
−12.5%
27
+12.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p21.10
−351%
4.68
+351%
1440p47.48
−355%
10.44
+355%
4K79.13
−376%
16.63
+376%
  • RTX A2000 has 351% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 has 355% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 has 376% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 84
+0%
84
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 129
+0%
129
+0%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117
+0%
117
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+0%
64
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+0%
58
+0%
Metro Exodus 34
+0%
34
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+0%
47
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+0%
56
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+0%
40
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how Pro VII and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 7% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 is 8% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 is 13% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 33.54 35.35
Recency 13 May 2020 10 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 70 Watt

Pro VII has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A2000, on the other hand, has a 5.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro VII and RTX A2000.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
vs
Vega Frontier Edition Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
vs
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
vs
Pro W6600X Radeon Pro W6600X
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
Pro W6800X Radeon Pro W6800X
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
RX 7900 XT Radeon RX 7900 XT
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 1938 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 598 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro VII or RTX A2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.