RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs RTX A2000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 Mobile with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX A2000 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
25.71

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking21148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.5452.84
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA106AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25606144
Core clock speed893 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1358 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors13,250 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate108.6299.5
Floating-point processing power6.953 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs4880
TMUs80192
Tensor Cores80192
Ray Tracing Cores2048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A2000 Mobile 25.71
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 53.98
+110%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A2000 Mobile 9906
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20796
+110%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD79
−103%
160−170
+103%
1440p42
−102%
85−90
+102%
4K36
−108%
75−80
+108%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 74
−103%
150−160
+103%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−96.4%
110−120
+96.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
−100%
110−120
+100%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−102%
170−180
+102%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
−110%
130−140
+110%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−103%
120−130
+103%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−109%
140−150
+109%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−103%
300−310
+103%
Hitman 3 50−55
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−105%
240−250
+105%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−105%
180−190
+105%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−97%
130−140
+97%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
−107%
180−190
+107%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−102%
210−220
+102%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−96.4%
110−120
+96.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 39
−105%
80−85
+105%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−102%
170−180
+102%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
−100%
100−105
+100%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−103%
120−130
+103%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−109%
140−150
+109%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−103%
300−310
+103%
Hitman 3 50−55
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−105%
240−250
+105%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−105%
180−190
+105%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−97%
130−140
+97%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 108
−104%
220−230
+104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−100%
110−120
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−102%
210−220
+102%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−96.4%
110−120
+96.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
−103%
65−70
+103%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
−107%
85−90
+107%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−103%
120−130
+103%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−103%
300−310
+103%
Hitman 3 50−55
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−105%
240−250
+105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 94
−102%
190−200
+102%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−100%
100−105
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 29
−107%
60−65
+107%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−97%
130−140
+97%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−104%
100−105
+104%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−105%
80−85
+105%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−104%
55−60
+104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
−104%
55−60
+104%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−107%
60−65
+107%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−100%
50−55
+100%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−107%
60−65
+107%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−104%
300−310
+104%
Hitman 3 30−35
−110%
65−70
+110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−108%
110−120
+108%
Metro Exodus 49
−104%
100−105
+104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
−106%
130−140
+106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−110%
300−310
+110%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−109%
90−95
+109%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−100%
50−55
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−100%
40−45
+100%
Hitman 3 20−22
−100%
40−45
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−106%
270−280
+106%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−107%
60−65
+107%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−97%
65−70
+97%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−100%
70−75
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35
−100%
70−75
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−105%
45−50
+105%

This is how RTX A2000 Mobile and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 103% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 102% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 108% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.71 53.98
Recency 12 April 2021 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 110% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 35.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 93 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.