Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU vs RTX A1000 Embedded

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking188not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency58.29no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameGA107Sno data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)31 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204840
Core clock speed630 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1140 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate72.96no data
Floating-point processing power4.669 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 31 October 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 53 Watt

RTX A1000 Embedded has 51.4% lower power consumption.

Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A1000 Embedded and Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A1000 Embedded is a mobile workstation card while Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
RTX A1000 Embedded
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
M3 Max 40-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 16 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 238 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.