RTX A1000 Embedded vs Radeon Pro Vega 48

Place in the ranking	193	192
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	57.78
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Vega 10	GA107S
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	19 March 2019 (5 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	2048
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	630 MHz
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	1140 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	249.6	72.96
Floating-point processing power	7.987 TFLOPS	4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	192	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	786 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	402.4 GB/s	224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 48 29.32

RTX A1000 Embedded 29.50
+0.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega 48 11299

RTX A1000 Embedded 11368
+0.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	29.32	29.50
Recency	19 March 2019	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	8 nm

Pro Vega 48 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A1000 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 0.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro Vega 48 and RTX A1000 Embedded.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.