Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking73not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation83.46no data
Power efficiency45.45no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameAD107Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816512
Core clock speed1620 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2130 MHz1750 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate187.456.00
Floating-point processing power12 TFLOPS1.792 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs8832
Tensor Cores88no data
Ray Tracing Cores22no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8Ring Bus
Length168 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 February 2024 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 65 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has an age advantage of 1 month, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile, on the other hand, has 7.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Ada Generation and Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation card while Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 27 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 20 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.