RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 6 GB
2024
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
27.62

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX 3050 6 GB by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking19772
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation75.4181.58
Power efficiency28.4747.49
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA107AD107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 8% better value for money than RTX 3050 6 GB.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042816
Core clock speed1042 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1470 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate105.8187.4
Floating-point processing power6.774 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs7288
Tensor Cores7288
Ray Tracing Cores1822

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Length242 mm168 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 6 GB 27.62
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 46.07
+66.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3050 6 GB 10658
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17778
+66.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.62 46.07
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 66.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 892 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.