Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
40 Watt
10.85
+43.3%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking425530
Place by popularitynot in top-10073
Power efficiency18.6718.61
Architectureno dataGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateno data15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153680
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt28 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xno data
Memory clock speed8448 MHzno data
Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 10.85
+43.3%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.57

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061
+32.4%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5332

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 24058
+10.7%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982
+74.1%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 4010

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1989
+68.6%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 1180

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
+105%
19
−105%
1440p14−16
+40%
10
−40%
4K21−24
+40%
15
−40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 23
+109%
11
−109%
Elden Ring 30−35
+77.8%
18
−77.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 22
+144%
9
−144%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+86.7%
30
−86.7%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+11.1%
27
−11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Valorant 40−45
+133%
18
−133%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 19
+90%
10
−90%
Dota 2 36
+63.6%
22
−63.6%
Elden Ring 30−35
+88.2%
17
−88.2%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+69.2%
26
−69.2%
Fortnite 60−65
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%
Forza Horizon 4 48
+100%
24
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
+177%
13
−177%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+76.5%
17
−76.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+37.7%
60−65
−37.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+383%
6
−383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%
Valorant 40−45
+200%
14
−200%
World of Tanks 150−160
+34.8%
110−120
−34.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 17
+240%
5
−240%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+33.3%
30−35
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 41
+105%
20
−105%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+37.7%
60−65
−37.7%
Valorant 40−45
+68%
24−27
−68%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
+133%
6
−133%
Elden Ring 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+150%
6
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
World of Tanks 75−80
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+56.3%
16
−56.3%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+30%
10
−30%
Valorant 27−30
+42.1%
18−20
−42.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Dota 2 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Elden Ring 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+45.5%
21−24
−45.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Fortnite 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Valorant 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4
+0%
4
+0%
Dota 2 36
+0%
36
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16
+0%
16
+0%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 105% faster in 1080p
  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 40% faster in 1440p
  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 40% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is ahead in 54 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.85 7.57
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 28 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has a 43.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 13 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 933 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.