GeForce 7600 GT vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Place in the ranking	427	1206
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.01
Power efficiency	24.86	1.00
Architecture	no data	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	no data	G73
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	9 March 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	no data
Core clock speed	no data	560 MHz
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	177 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	6.720
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	LPDDR5x	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	no data	256 MB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8448 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	22.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	no data	3.0
OpenGL	no data	2.1
OpenCL	no data	N/A
Vulkan	-	N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	34 +3300%	1−2 −3300%
1440p	17	0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

199.00

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.81	0.58
Chip lithography	4 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	40 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 1763.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook card while GeForce 7600 GT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.