ATI Radeon X800 GTO vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS with Radeon X800 GTO, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
30 Watt
10.59
+3430%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS outperforms ATI X800 GTO by a whopping 3430% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4401340
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.240.42
Architectureno dataR400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameno dataR423
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateno data29 December 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data160 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.800
ROPsno data12
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_19.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
1440p16-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 23 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27 0−1
Battlefield 5 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Counter-Strike 2 19 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 0−1
Far Cry 5 30 0−1
Fortnite 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 0−1
Valorant 90−95
+4600%
2−3
−4600%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27 0−1
Battlefield 5 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Counter-Strike 2 16 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+3625%
4−5
−3625%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 0−1
Far Cry 5 28 0−1
Fortnite 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 35 0−1
Metro Exodus 20−22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
Valorant 90−95
+4600%
2−3
−4600%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Counter-Strike 2 14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 0−1
Far Cry 5 26 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19 0−1
Valorant 90−95
+4600%
2−3
−4600%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+3700%
2−3
−3700%
Grand Theft Auto V 15 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Valorant 110−120
+3567%
3−4
−3567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1
Valorant 50−55
+5100%
1−2
−5100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10 0−1

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and ATI X800 GTO compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 3500% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.59 0.30
Chip lithography 4 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 49 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 3430% higher aggregate performance score, a 3150% more advanced lithography process, and 63.3% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 GTO in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook card while Radeon X800 GTO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon X800 GTO
Radeon X800 GTO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 33 votes

Rate Radeon X800 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or Radeon X800 GTO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.