Arc A530M vs Quadro T600 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T600 Mobile with Arc A530M, including specs and performance data.

T600 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 40 Watt
18.37
+3.6%

T600 Mobile outperforms Arc A530M by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking301308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency31.4818.71
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU117DG2-256
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)1 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961536
Core clock speed780 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate78.96124.8
Floating-point processing power2.527 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs5696
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T600 Mobile 18.37
+3.6%
Arc A530M 17.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T600 Mobile 7077
+3.5%
Arc A530M 6836

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Far Cry 5 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+5%
100−105
−5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+925%
8−9
−925%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+1225%
4−5
−1225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+193%
27−30
−193%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Far Cry 5 49
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+5%
100−105
−5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+925%
8−9
−925%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
+875%
4−5
−875%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+478%
9−10
−478%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+193%
27−30
−193%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Far Cry 5 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+5%
100−105
−5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+211%
9−10
−211%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+193%
27−30
−193%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Hitman 3 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+10%
80−85
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
+5.3%
95−100
−5.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+5%
80−85
−5%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 0−1
Battlefield 5 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how T600 Mobile and Arc A530M compete in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is 13% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T600 Mobile is 1550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is ahead in 21 test (72%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (28%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.37 17.74
Recency 12 April 2021 1 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 65 Watt

T600 Mobile has a 3.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 62.5% lower power consumption.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro T600 Mobile and Arc A530M.

Be aware that Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc A530M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 195 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.