Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	212	412
Place by popularity	66	not in top-100
Power efficiency	24.18	no data
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Xe² (2025)
GPU code name	GA106	Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	7
Core clock speed	735 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1035 MHz	1850 MHz
Number of transistors	13,250 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	82.80	no data
Floating-point processing power	5.299 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	no data
TMUs	80	no data
Tensor Cores	80	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	20	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_2
Shader Model	6.6	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2	-
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.34
+124%

Arc Graphics 130V 11.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10128
+124%

Arc Graphics 130V 4512

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 18057
+89.6%

Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 13360
+61.8%

Arc Graphics 130V 8255

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 5170
+59.5%

Arc Graphics 130V 3242

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	74 +131%	32 −131%
1440p	42 +133%	18−20 −133%
4K	28 +133%	12−14 −133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +19.5%	41 −19.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	62 +130%	27−30 −130%
Elden Ring	80 +135%	30−35 −135%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +111%	35−40 −111%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +58.1%	31 −58.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	50 +138%	21−24 −138%
Forza Horizon 4	128 +80.3%	71 −80.3%
Metro Exodus	84 +163%	30−35 −163%
Red Dead Redemption 2	98 +227%	30−33 −227%
Valorant	121 +169%	45−50 −169%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +111%	35−40 −111%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +75%	28 −75%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +150%	16−18 −150%
Dota 2	102 +149%	41 −149%
Elden Ring	104 +206%	30−35 −206%
Far Cry 5	75 +168%	28 −168%
Fortnite	130−140 +94%	65−70 −94%
Forza Horizon 4	105 +81%	58 −81%
Grand Theft Auto V	94 +124%	40−45 −124%
Metro Exodus	62 +93.8%	30−35 −93.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +84.1%	85−90 −84.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 +30%	30−33 −30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +146%	35−40 −146%
Valorant	79 +75.6%	45−50 −75.6%
World of Tanks	260−270 +62.3%	160−170 −62.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +111%	35−40 −111%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +96%	25 −96%
Cyberpunk 2077	35 +150%	14−16 −150%
Dota 2	113 +126%	50−55 −126%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +71.7%	45−50 −71.7%
Forza Horizon 4	90 +87.5%	48 −87.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +84.1%	85−90 −84.1%
Valorant	112 +149%	45−50 −149%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	41 +173%	14−16 −173%
Elden Ring	36 +112%	16−18 −112%
Grand Theft Auto V	41 +156%	16−18 −156%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +133%	75−80 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
World of Tanks	170−180 +108%	80−85 −108%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +130%	21−24 −130%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
Cyberpunk 2077	21 +133%	9−10 −133%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +200%	24−27 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	61 +126%	27−30 −126%
Metro Exodus	60 +150%	24−27 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +179%	14−16 −179%
Valorant	81 +179%	27−30 −179%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Dota 2	44 +100%	21−24 −100%
Elden Ring	19 +171%	7−8 −171%
Grand Theft Auto V	44 +100%	21−24 −100%
Metro Exodus	21 +200%	7−8 −200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 +138%	30−35 −138%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +113%	8−9 −113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 +100%	21−24 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +155%	10−12 −155%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +150%	4−5 −150%
Dota 2	54 +125%	24−27 −125%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Fortnite	30−35 +154%	12−14 −154%
Forza Horizon 4	34 +127%	14−16 −127%
Valorant	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%