Radeon 660M vs Quadro T500 Mobile

Place in the ranking	483	332
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	34.32	27.95
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU117	Rembrandt+
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	2 December 2020 (4 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	384
Core clock speed	1365 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz	1900 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	94.92	45.60
Floating-point processing power	3.037 TFLOPS	1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	56	24
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T500 Mobile 9.01

Radeon 660M 16.31
+81%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T500 Mobile 7996
+18.6%

Radeon 660M 6743

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T500 Mobile 4225

Radeon 660M 4848
+14.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T500 Mobile 23453

Radeon 660M 31515
+34.4%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T500 Mobile 1788
+15.8%

Radeon 660M 1544

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	36 +44%	25 −44%
1440p	15 −80%	27−30 +80%
4K	17 −76.5%	30−35 +76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−71.4%

24
+71.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −4.5%	21−24 +4.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −100%	26 +100%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −42.9%	20 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	30 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −8.3%	65−70 +8.3%
Hitman 3	16−18 −23.5%	21 +23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −8%	50−55 +8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −6.7%	30−35 +6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −3.3%	60−65 +3.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −4.5%	21−24 +4.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −46.2%	19 +46.2%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14 +0%
Far Cry 5	28 +21.7%	21−24 −21.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −8.3%	65−70 +8.3%
Hitman 3	16−18 −23.5%	21 +23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −8%	50−55 +8%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −10.7%	30−35 +10.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −10%	33 +10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +7.7%	24−27 −7.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −3.3%	60−65 +3.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −4.5%	21−24 +4.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −66.7%	45−50 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Far Cry 5	27 +17.4%	21−24 −17.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −80%	45−50 +80%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −8.3%	65−70 +8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19 +26.7%	15 −26.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −3.3%	60−65 +3.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Hitman 3	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −13.2%	40−45 +13.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −8.8%	60−65 +8.8%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Hitman 3	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −13.9%	40−45 +13.9%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus

30−35

+0%

30−35

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Hitman 3	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	22 +0%	22 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27 +0%	27 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

+0%

27−30

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

+0%

16−18

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

+0%

9−10

+0%

This is how T500 Mobile and Radeon 660M compete in popular games:

T500 Mobile is 44% faster in 1080p
Radeon 660M is 80% faster in 1440p
Radeon 660M is 76% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T500 Mobile is 30% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 660M is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T500 Mobile is ahead in 5 tests (7%)
Radeon 660M is ahead in 42 tests (58%)
there's a draw in 25 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.01	16.31
Recency	2 December 2020	3 January 2023
Chip lithography	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	40 Watt

T500 Mobile has 122.2% lower power consumption.

Radeon 660M, on the other hand, has a 81% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 660M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 660M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.