RTX A500 vs Quadro T500 Mobile

Place in the ranking	486	315
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	34.46	20.10
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU117	GA107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	2 December 2020 (4 years ago)	10 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	2048
Core clock speed	1365 MHz	1440 MHz
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	94.92	113.3
Floating-point processing power	3.037 TFLOPS	7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	36 −94.4%	70−75 +94.4%
1440p	15 −80%	27−30 +80%
4K	17 −76.5%	30−35 +76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
Elden Ring	24−27 −80%	45−50 +80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −89.7%	55−60 +89.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	8 −75%	14−16 +75%
Elden Ring	24−27 −80%	45−50 +80%
Far Cry 5	30 −83.3%	55−60 +83.3%
Fortnite	50−55 −88.7%	100−105 +88.7%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −94.4%	70−75 +94.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −83.1%	130−140 +83.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −87.5%	45−50 +87.5%
Valorant	30−35 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −89.7%	55−60 +89.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Dota 2	90 −88.9%	170−180 +88.9%
Elden Ring	24−27 −80%	45−50 +80%
Far Cry 5	28 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Fortnite	50−55 −88.7%	100−105 +88.7%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −94.4%	70−75 +94.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	31 −93.5%	60−65 +93.5%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −87.5%	45−50 +87.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −83.1%	130−140 +83.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −87.5%	45−50 +87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Valorant	30−35 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
World of Tanks	130−140 −88%	250−260 +88%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −89.7%	55−60 +89.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 −80%	9−10 +80%
Dota 2	75 −86.7%	140−150 +86.7%
Far Cry 5	27 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −94.4%	70−75 +94.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −83.1%	130−140 +83.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19 −84.2%	35−40 +84.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

50−55
−88.7%

100−105

+88.7%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Grand Theft Auto V	13 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
Valorant	21−24 −73.9%	40−45 +73.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −84.2%	35−40 +84.2%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −84.2%	35−40 +84.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

21−24

−81.8%

40−45
+81.8%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Grand Theft Auto V	14 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −84.2%	35−40 +84.2%
Valorant	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Dota 2	28 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −92.3%	50−55 +92.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

9−10
−77.8%

16−18

+77.8%

This is how T500 Mobile and RTX A500 compete in popular games:

RTX A500 is 94% faster in 1080p
RTX A500 is 80% faster in 1440p
RTX A500 is 76% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.01	17.52
Recency	2 December 2020	10 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	60 Watt

T500 Mobile has 233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A500, on the other hand, has a 94.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.