RTX A4500 vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
19.45

RTX A4500 outperforms T1200 Mobile by a whopping 189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking29146
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency74.3819.33
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10247168
Core clock speed855 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate91.20369.6
Floating-point processing power2.918 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs64224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s640.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−176%
160−170
+176%
1440p33
−188%
95−100
+188%
4K81
−184%
230−240
+184%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−182%
110−120
+182%
Elden Ring 53
−183%
150−160
+183%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−174%
170−180
+174%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−165%
45−50
+165%
Elden Ring 47
−177%
130−140
+177%
Far Cry 5 65
−177%
180−190
+177%
Fortnite 100−110
−182%
290−300
+182%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−180%
230−240
+180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−165%
350−400
+165%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%
Valorant 75−80
−182%
220−230
+182%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−174%
170−180
+174%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−186%
40−45
+186%
Dota 2 114
−163%
300−310
+163%
Elden Ring 38
−163%
100−105
+163%
Far Cry 5 59
−188%
170−180
+188%
Fortnite 100−110
−182%
290−300
+182%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−180%
230−240
+180%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
−182%
200−210
+182%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−188%
150−160
+188%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−165%
350−400
+165%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
−182%
200−210
+182%
Valorant 75−80
−182%
220−230
+182%
World of Tanks 220−230
−185%
650−700
+185%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−174%
170−180
+174%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−173%
30−33
+173%
Dota 2 107
−180%
300−310
+180%
Far Cry 5 56
−186%
160−170
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−180%
230−240
+180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−165%
350−400
+165%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−170%
100−105
+170%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−182%
290−300
+182%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 30−35
−181%
90−95
+181%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−170%
100−105
+170%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−173%
120−130
+173%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−188%
75−80
+188%
Valorant 50−55
−180%
140−150
+180%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−157%
18−20
+157%
Far Cry 5 41
−168%
110−120
+168%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−180%
140−150
+180%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−180%
140−150
+180%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−188%
95−100
+188%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−188%
95−100
+188%
Valorant 21−24
−183%
65−70
+183%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Dota 2 109
−175%
300−310
+175%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−176%
160−170
+176%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−183%
65−70
+183%

This is how T1200 Mobile and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 is 176% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 is 188% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4500 is 184% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.45 56.15
Recency 12 April 2021 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 200 Watt

T1200 Mobile has 1011.1% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 188.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 144 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 198 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.