RTX A2000 12 GB vs Quadro T1200 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with RTX A2000 12 GB, including specs and performance data.
RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms T1200 Mobile by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 291 | 141 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 90.94 |
| Power efficiency | 74.38 | 35.03 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Ampere (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | TU117 | GA106 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 April 2021 (3 years ago) | 23 November 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $449 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 3328 |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 562 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,700 million | 12,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 | 124.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.918 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48 |
| TMUs | 64 | 104 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 104 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 26 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 167 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 8.6 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 58
−72.4%
| 100−110
+72.4%
|
| 1440p | 33
−81.8%
| 60−65
+81.8%
|
| 4K | 81
−72.8%
| 140−150
+72.8%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 4.49 |
| 1440p | no data | 7.48 |
| 4K | no data | 3.21 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−79.5%
|
70−75
+79.5%
|
| Elden Ring | 53
−79.2%
|
95−100
+79.2%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
−77.4%
|
110−120
+77.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 17
−76.5%
|
30−33
+76.5%
|
| Elden Ring | 47
−80.9%
|
85−90
+80.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65
−69.2%
|
110−120
+69.2%
|
| Fortnite | 100−110
−74.8%
|
180−190
+74.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
−82.9%
|
150−160
+82.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
−81.8%
|
240−250
+81.8%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
−77.8%
|
80−85
+77.8%
|
| Valorant | 75−80
−79.5%
|
140−150
+79.5%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
−77.4%
|
110−120
+77.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14
−71.4%
|
24−27
+71.4%
|
| Dota 2 | 114
−75.4%
|
200−210
+75.4%
|
| Elden Ring | 38
−71.1%
|
65−70
+71.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 59
−69.5%
|
100−105
+69.5%
|
| Fortnite | 100−110
−74.8%
|
180−190
+74.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
−82.9%
|
150−160
+82.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 71
−83.1%
|
130−140
+83.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55
−82.7%
|
95−100
+82.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
−81.8%
|
240−250
+81.8%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
−77.8%
|
80−85
+77.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 71
−83.1%
|
130−140
+83.1%
|
| Valorant | 75−80
−79.5%
|
140−150
+79.5%
|
| World of Tanks | 220−230
−75.4%
|
400−450
+75.4%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
−77.4%
|
110−120
+77.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 11
−63.6%
|
18−20
+63.6%
|
| Dota 2 | 107
−77.6%
|
190−200
+77.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 56
−78.6%
|
100−105
+78.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
−82.9%
|
150−160
+82.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
−81.8%
|
240−250
+81.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 37
−75.7%
|
65−70
+75.7%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 100−110
−74.8%
|
180−190
+74.8%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Elden Ring | 30−35
−71.9%
|
55−60
+71.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 37
−75.7%
|
65−70
+75.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
−81.8%
|
80−85
+81.8%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
−76.5%
|
30−33
+76.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−73.1%
|
45−50
+73.1%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
−80%
|
90−95
+80%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−75%
|
70−75
+75%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 41
−82.9%
|
75−80
+82.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−80%
|
90−95
+80%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 50−55
−80%
|
90−95
+80%
|
4K
High Preset
| Elden Ring | 14−16
−71.4%
|
24−27
+71.4%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−81.8%
|
60−65
+81.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
−71.4%
|
24−27
+71.4%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
−75%
|
21−24
+75%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
−81.8%
|
60−65
+81.8%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−73.9%
|
40−45
+73.9%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
−57.9%
|
30−33
+57.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 109
−74.3%
|
190−200
+74.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−80%
|
45−50
+80%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−72.4%
|
50−55
+72.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
−72.4%
|
100−105
+72.4%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 21−24
−73.9%
|
40−45
+73.9%
|
This is how T1200 Mobile and RTX A2000 12 GB compete in popular games:
- RTX A2000 12 GB is 72% faster in 1080p
- RTX A2000 12 GB is 82% faster in 1440p
- RTX A2000 12 GB is 73% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.45 | 35.62 |
| Recency | 12 April 2021 | 23 November 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 70 Watt |
T1200 Mobile has 288.9% lower power consumption.
RTX A2000 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 83.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX A2000 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
