Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Quadro RTX 8000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 8000 with Iris Pro Graphics P6300, including specs and performance data.

RTX 8000
2018
48 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
49.97
+1104%

RTX 8000 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P6300 by a whopping 1104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking60684
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.87no data
Power efficiency13.3019.15
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameTU102Broadwell GT3e
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)5 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608384
Core clock speed1395 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate509.838.40
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs966
TMUs28848
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount48 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.80
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 8000 49.97
+1104%
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 4.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 8000 19278
+1106%
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 1599

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 49.97 4.15
Recency 13 August 2018 5 September 2014
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 8000 has a 1104.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300, on the other hand, has 1633.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 463 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 13 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.