GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated294
Place by popularitynot in top-10020
Power efficiencyno data28.53
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU102GA107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46082048
Core clock speed1230 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate466.694.53
Floating-point processing power14.93 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs28864
Tensor Cores576256
Ray Tracing Cores7232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 45 Watt

RTX 8000 Passive has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 477.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 8000 Passive is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 20 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2168 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.