Quadro K2000D vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with Quadro K2000D, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Mobile
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
36.07
+778%

RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms K2000D by a whopping 778% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking132689
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.41
Power efficiency22.875.62
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTU104GK107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)1 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072384
Core clock speed1035 MHz954 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt51 Watt
Texture fill rate296.630.53
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs19232
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data202 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA7.53.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD133
+850%
14−16
−850%
1440p79
+778%
9−10
−778%
4K49
+880%
5−6
−880%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data42.79
1440pno data66.56
4Kno data119.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+857%
7−8
−857%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+940%
10−11
−940%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+843%
7−8
−843%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+786%
14−16
−786%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 125
+793%
14−16
−793%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+857%
7−8
−857%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+822%
9−10
−822%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+850%
10−11
−850%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+800%
21−24
−800%
Hitman 3 80−85
+811%
9−10
−811%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+794%
18−20
−794%
Metro Exodus 144
+800%
16−18
−800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 113
+842%
12−14
−842%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+900%
14−16
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+814%
14−16
−814%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+811%
9−10
−811%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+843%
7−8
−843%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+786%
14−16
−786%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 118
+883%
12−14
−883%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+857%
7−8
−857%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+822%
9−10
−822%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+850%
10−11
−850%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+800%
21−24
−800%
Hitman 3 80−85
+811%
9−10
−811%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+794%
18−20
−794%
Metro Exodus 144
+800%
16−18
−800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 99
+890%
10−11
−890%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+900%
14−16
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+789%
9−10
−789%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+814%
14−16
−814%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 73
+813%
8−9
−813%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+843%
7−8
−843%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 88
+780%
10−11
−780%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+857%
7−8
−857%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+822%
9−10
−822%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+800%
21−24
−800%
Hitman 3 80−85
+811%
9−10
−811%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+794%
18−20
−794%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+900%
14−16
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+900%
10−11
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+814%
14−16
−814%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+800%
12−14
−800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+825%
8−9
−825%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+883%
6−7
−883%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+800%
7−8
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+950%
4−5
−950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66
+843%
7−8
−843%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+780%
5−6
−780%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+804%
24−27
−804%
Hitman 3 50−55
+900%
5−6
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+822%
9−10
−822%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+800%
8−9
−800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+830%
10−11
−830%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+805%
21−24
−805%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90
+800%
10−11
−800%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+850%
4−5
−850%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Hitman 3 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+894%
18−20
−894%
Metro Exodus 76
+850%
8−9
−850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+788%
8−9
−788%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+900%
4−5
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
+850%
4−5
−850%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+940%
5−6
−940%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50
+900%
5−6
−900%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and K2000D compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 850% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 778% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 880% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.07 4.11
Recency 27 May 2019 1 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 51 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 777.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

K2000D, on the other hand, has 115.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2000D in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Quadro K2000D is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Quadro K2000D

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 34 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro K2000D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.