GeForce 820M vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	134	1035
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	22.51	5.85
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	TU104	GF117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	27 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	96
Core clock speed	1035 MHz	625 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,600 million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	296.6	10.00
Floating-point processing power	9.492 TFLOPS	0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	8
TMUs	192	16
Tensor Cores	384	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	no data	2.0
Optimus	-	+
GameWorks	-	+
VR Ready	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 Mobile 36.12
+2722%

GeForce 820M 1.28

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 5000 Mobile 24620
+1844%

GeForce 820M 1267

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 5000 Mobile 54153
+961%

GeForce 820M 5106

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 5000 Mobile 23035
+2468%

GeForce 820M 897

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 5000 Mobile 117274
+1831%

GeForce 820M 6074

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	133 +787%	15 −787%
1440p	79 +3850%	2−3 −3850%
4K	54 +5300%	1−2 −5300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

65−70
+1575%

4−5

−1575%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 +1633%	6−7 −1633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +3200%	2−3 −3200%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +3000%	4−5 −3000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	125 +3025%	4−5 −3025%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +1575%	4−5 −1575%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +8200%	1−2 −8200%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +3067%	3−4 −3067%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +9350%	2−3 −9350%
Hitman 3	80−85 +1267%	6−7 −1267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +1050%	14−16 −1050%
Metro Exodus	144 +2780%	5−6 −2780%
Red Dead Redemption 2	113 +5550%	2−3 −5550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +1650%	8−9 −1650%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +288%	30−35 −288%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +1267%	6−7 −1267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +3200%	2−3 −3200%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +3000%	4−5 −3000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	118 +2850%	4−5 −2850%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +1575%	4−5 −1575%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +8200%	1−2 −8200%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +3067%	3−4 −3067%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +9350%	2−3 −9350%
Hitman 3	80−85 +1267%	6−7 −1267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +1050%	14−16 −1050%
Metro Exodus	144 +2780%	5−6 −2780%
Red Dead Redemption 2	99 +4850%	2−3 −4850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +1650%	8−9 −1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +627%	10−12 −627%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +288%	30−35 −288%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	73 +1117%	6−7 −1117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +3200%	2−3 −3200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	88 +2100%	4−5 −2100%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +1575%	4−5 −1575%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +8200%	1−2 −8200%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +9350%	2−3 −9350%
Hitman 3	80−85 +1267%	6−7 −1267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +1050%	14−16 −1050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +1650%	8−9 −1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100 +809%	10−12 −809%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +288%	30−35 −288%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

108
+5300%

2−3

−5300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +7300%	1−2 −7300%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +2850%	2−3 −2850%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	63 +6200%	1−2 −6200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +4100%	1−2 −4100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	66	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +2900%	1−2 −2900%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +4300%	1−2 −4300%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +3000%	7−8 −3000%
Hitman 3	50−55 +614%	7−8 −614%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +1975%	4−5 −1975%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +3500%	2−3 −3500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +3000%	3−4 −3000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	190−200 +3067%	6−7 −3067%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90
+2150%

4−5

−2150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +3700%	1−2 −3700%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35	0−1
Hitman 3	30−35 +3000%	1−2 −3000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +2883%	6−7 −2883%
Metro Exodus	76 +3700%	2−3 −3700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	71 +3450%	2−3 −3450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +3900%	1−2 −3900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +2300%	1−2 −2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	38	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14	0−1
Far Cry 5	21−24	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +5200%	1−2 −5200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +5100%	1−2 −5100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50
+1567%

3−4

−1567%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and GeForce 820M compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Mobile is 787% faster in 1080p
RTX 5000 Mobile is 3850% faster in 1440p
RTX 5000 Mobile is 5300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 5000 Mobile is 9350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 5000 Mobile surpassed GeForce 820M in all 47 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	36.12	1.28
Recency	27 May 2019	27 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	15 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 2721.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 820M, on the other hand, has 633.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 820M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 820M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.