Iris Plus Graphics vs Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q with Iris Plus Graphics, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Max-Q
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
32.62
+591%

RTX 4000 Max-Q outperforms Iris Plus Graphics by a whopping 591% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking171650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.0721.66
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameTU104Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560512
Core clock speed780 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate220.832.00
Floating-point processing power7.066 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs16032
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1625 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Max-Q 32.62
+591%
Iris Plus Graphics 4.72

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 Max-Q 12539
+591%
Iris Plus Graphics 1814

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD88
+633%
12−14
−633%
1440p46
+667%
6−7
−667%
4K56
+600%
8−9
−600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+622%
9−10
−622%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+656%
9−10
−656%
Elden Ring 110−120
+594%
16−18
−594%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+675%
12−14
−675%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+622%
9−10
−622%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+656%
9−10
−656%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+619%
21−24
−619%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+720%
10−11
−720%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Valorant 130−140
+622%
18−20
−622%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+675%
12−14
−675%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+622%
9−10
−622%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+656%
9−10
−656%
Dota 2 36
+620%
5−6
−620%
Elden Ring 110−120
+594%
16−18
−594%
Far Cry 5 66
+633%
9−10
−633%
Fortnite 150−160
+619%
21−24
−619%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+619%
21−24
−619%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+657%
14−16
−657%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+720%
10−11
−720%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+667%
24−27
−667%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+594%
16−18
−594%
Valorant 130−140
+622%
18−20
−622%
World of Tanks 270−280
+593%
40−45
−593%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+675%
12−14
−675%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+622%
9−10
−622%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+656%
9−10
−656%
Dota 2 101
+621%
14−16
−621%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+642%
12−14
−642%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+619%
21−24
−619%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+667%
24−27
−667%
Valorant 130−140
+622%
18−20
−622%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 55−60
+625%
8−9
−625%
Elden Ring 60−65
+675%
8−9
−675%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+625%
8−9
−625%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+629%
24−27
−629%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
World of Tanks 200−210
+597%
30−33
−597%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+600%
9−10
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+636%
14−16
−636%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+658%
12−14
−658%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+630%
10−11
−630%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+657%
7−8
−657%
Valorant 95−100
+692%
12−14
−692%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Dota 2 60−65
+650%
8−9
−650%
Elden Ring 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+663%
8−9
−663%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+636%
14−16
−636%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+650%
8−9
−650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+620%
5−6
−620%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Dota 2 65
+622%
9−10
−622%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+667%
6−7
−667%
Fortnite 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+643%
7−8
−643%
Valorant 45−50
+600%
7−8
−600%

This is how RTX 4000 Max-Q and Iris Plus Graphics compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Max-Q is 633% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Max-Q is 667% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Max-Q is 600% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.62 4.72
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 4000 Max-Q has a 591.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Plus Graphics, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 23 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 376 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.