Radeon 680M vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile with Radeon 680M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3000 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
26.25
+71.2%

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms 680M by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking210347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.4921.02
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU106Rembrandt+
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304768
Core clock speed945 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate198.7105.6
Floating-point processing power6.359 TFLOPS3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14448
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores3612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Mobile 26.25
+71.2%
Radeon 680M 15.33

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+71.2%
Radeon 680M 5909

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3000 Mobile 19879
+91.7%
Radeon 680M 10371

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3000 Mobile 50309
+45.4%
Radeon 680M 34600

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3000 Mobile 14842
+116%
Radeon 680M 6865

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3000 Mobile 91394
+111%
Radeon 680M 43225

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3000 Mobile 5589
+143%
Radeon 680M 2303

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

RTX 3000 Mobile 74
+19.8%
Radeon 680M 62

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

RTX 3000 Mobile 111
+24.5%
Radeon 680M 89

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

RTX 3000 Mobile 114
+97.4%
Radeon 680M 58

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

RTX 3000 Mobile 116
+64.3%
Radeon 680M 70

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

RTX 3000 Mobile 119
+172%
Radeon 680M 44

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

RTX 3000 Mobile 46
+39.4%
Radeon 680M 33

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

RTX 3000 Mobile 82
+167%
Radeon 680M 31

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

RTX 3000 Mobile 12
Radeon 680M 29
+147%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

RTX 3000 Mobile 158
+103%
Radeon 680M 78

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
+181%
37
−181%
1440p27−30
+58.8%
17
−58.8%
4K88
+700%
11
−700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+10.3%
39
−10.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
+97.4%
35−40
−97.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+18.4%
38
−18.4%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+50.9%
55−60
−50.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+48.3%
29
−48.3%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+46.3%
40−45
−46.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+44.7%
45−50
−44.7%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+37.3%
110−120
−37.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
+65.6%
32
−65.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+39.5%
85−90
−39.5%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+50%
60−65
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+44.7%
45−50
−44.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+56.1%
55−60
−56.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+24.7%
85−90
−24.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+46.2%
35−40
−46.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+45.2%
31
−45.2%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+50.9%
55−60
−50.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+105%
21
−105%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+46.3%
40−45
−46.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+44.7%
45−50
−44.7%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+37.3%
110−120
−37.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
+76.7%
30
−76.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+39.5%
85−90
−39.5%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+50%
60−65
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+44.7%
45−50
−44.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+89.4%
47
−89.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+40%
40−45
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+24.7%
85−90
−24.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
+0%
35−40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+66.7%
27
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+153%
17
−153%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+46.3%
40−45
−46.3%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+37.3%
110−120
−37.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
+96.3%
27
−96.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+179%
43
−179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+123%
40
−123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+133%
24
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+489%
18
−489%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+44.7%
45−50
−44.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+51.5%
30−35
−51.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+73.3%
14−16
−73.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+54.5%
11
−54.5%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+59.6%
90−95
−59.6%
Hitman 3 30−35
+55%
20−22
−55%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+56.3%
30−35
−56.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+115%
27
−115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+94.1%
17
−94.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+39%
100−110
−39%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+51.7%
27−30
−51.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+52.9%
16−18
−52.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+50.6%
85−90
−50.6%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+123%
13
−123%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4
−75%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+129%
14
−129%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+53.3%
14−16
−53.3%

This is how RTX 3000 Mobile and Radeon 680M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 181% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 59% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 489% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.25 15.33
Recency 27 May 2019 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile has a 71.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 680M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 680M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 680M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 288 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 952 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.