RTX A4500 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and RTX A4500 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3000 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
26.25

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms RTX 3000 Mobile by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking21078
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.4922.14
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU106GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23045888
Core clock speed945 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate198.7276.0
Floating-point processing power6.359 TFLOPS17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs144184
Tensor Cores288184
Ray Tracing Cores3646

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Mobile 26.25
RTX A4500 Mobile 45.22
+72.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
RTX A4500 Mobile 17424
+72.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
−63.5%
170−180
+63.5%
4K88
−70.5%
150−160
+70.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
+2467%
3−4
−2467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 85−90
−62.8%
140−150
+62.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+2550%
2−3
−2550%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−66.7%
100−105
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−72.2%
260−270
+72.2%
Hitman 3 50−55
+1225%
4−5
−1225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+1400%
8−9
−1400%
Metro Exodus 90−95
−66.7%
150−160
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+2125%
4−5
−2125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+279%
27−30
−279%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1800%
3−4
−1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 85−90
−62.8%
140−150
+62.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+2550%
2−3
−2550%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−66.7%
100−105
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−72.2%
260−270
+72.2%
Hitman 3 50−55
+1225%
4−5
−1225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+1400%
8−9
−1400%
Metro Exodus 90−95
−66.7%
150−160
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+2125%
4−5
−2125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+522%
9−10
−522%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+279%
27−30
−279%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+2550%
2−3
−2550%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−66.7%
100−105
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−72.2%
260−270
+72.2%
Hitman 3 50−55
+1225%
4−5
−1225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+1400%
8−9
−1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+2125%
4−5
−2125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+522%
9−10
−522%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+279%
27−30
−279%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−70%
85−90
+70%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−66.7%
250−260
+66.7%
Hitman 3 30−35
+417%
6−7
−417%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−70%
85−90
+70%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−63.8%
95−100
+63.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−71.2%
250−260
+71.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+2100%
2−3
−2100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Hitman 3 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−71.6%
230−240
+71.6%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−71.9%
55−60
+71.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%

This is how RTX 3000 Mobile and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 63% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 70% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 2600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3000 Mobile surpassed RTX A4500 Mobile in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.25 45.22
Recency 27 May 2019 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 140 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile has 75% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 72.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 288 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.