Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile vs RTX A4500 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking75not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.88no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGA104TU104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)8 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores58883072
Core clock speed930 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1530 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate276.0293.8
Floating-point processing power17.66 TFLOPS9.4 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs184192
Tensor Cores184384
Ray Tracing Cores4648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.67.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2022 8 June 2020
Chip lithography 8 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 110 Watt

RTX A4500 Mobile has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 5000 X2 Mobile, on the other hand, has 27.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A4500 Mobile and Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A4500 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 16 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.