Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking207not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameN19E-Q1TU102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19204608
Core clock speed945 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate198.7466.6
Floating-point processing power6.359 gflops14.93 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 48 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 260 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile has an age advantage of 9 months, and 225% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000 Passive, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and Quadro RTX 8000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Quadro RTX 8000 Passive is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 261 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 20 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.