Radeon 890M vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) with Radeon 890M, including specs and performance data.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
2019
12 Watt
5.44

Radeon 890M outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) by a whopping 263% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking607277
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameIce Lake G7 Gen. 11Strix Point
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)July 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores641024
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data185.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−172%
49
+172%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Far Cry 5 12
−233%
40−45
+233%
Far Cry New Dawn 9
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Hitman 3 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Metro Exodus 18
−261%
65−70
+261%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12
−233%
40−45
+233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55
+96.4%
27−30
−96.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Far Cry 5 11
−218%
35−40
+218%
Far Cry New Dawn 4
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Hitman 3 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Metro Exodus 14
−257%
50−55
+257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
−233%
30−33
+233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+325%
4−5
−325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 51
+82.1%
27−30
−82.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Hitman 3 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−254%
170−180
+254%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Hitman 3 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Hitman 3 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and Radeon 890M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 890M is 172% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is ahead in 22 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.44 19.73
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has 25% lower power consumption.

Radeon 890M, on the other hand, has a 262.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 890M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is a notebook card while Radeon 890M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 237 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 58 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.