Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameTU106Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920 ×24
Core clock speed945 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Wattno data
Texture fill rate165.6 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power5.299 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs64 ×2no data
TMUs120 ×2no data
Tensor Cores240 ×2no data
Ray Tracing Cores30 ×2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width192 Bit ×2no data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 X2
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.