Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile vs RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameAD106TU106
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081920 ×2
Core clock speed1395 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors22,900 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate244.1165.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power15.62 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs4864 ×2
TMUs144120 ×2
Tensor Cores144240 ×2
Ray Tracing Cores3630 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.97.5
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 160 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 39.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation or Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.