GeForce 9400 vs Quadro P620

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P620 with GeForce 9400, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P620
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
9.50
+3700%

P620 outperforms 9400 by a whopping 3700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4691362
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.330.43
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP107C79
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51216
Core clock speed1177 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate46.183.600
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length145 mmno data
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.50
+3700%
GeForce 9400 0.25

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3652
+3627%
GeForce 9400 98

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD48
+4700%
1−2
−4700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Elden Ring 27−30 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Metro Exodus 24−27 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1
Valorant 35−40 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Dota 2 30 0−1
Elden Ring 27−30 0−1
Far Cry 5 64
+6300%
1−2
−6300%
Fortnite 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35 0−1
Metro Exodus 6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 125
+4067%
3−4
−4067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 0−1
Valorant 35−40 0−1
World of Tanks 130−140
+4500%
3−4
−4500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Dota 2 83
+4050%
2−3
−4050%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+7300%
1−2
−7300%
Valorant 35−40 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14 0−1
Elden Ring 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+4500%
1−2
−4500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 0−1
World of Tanks 65−70
+6700%
1−2
−6700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Metro Exodus 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Valorant 24−27 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 20−22 0−1
Elden Ring 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 20−22 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Fortnite 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Valorant 9−10 0−1

This is how Quadro P620 and GeForce 9400 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P620 is 4700% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.50 0.25
Recency 1 February 2018 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm

Quadro P620 has a 3700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
NVIDIA GeForce 9400
GeForce 9400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 637 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 15 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.