Quadro 3000M X2 vs Quadro P620

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking468not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.21no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP107EXMF104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512240
Core clock speed1177 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate46.1818.00
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length145 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz625 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.12.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 22 February 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro P620 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P620 and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation card while Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 618 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.