Arc B580 vs Quadro P620

Place in the ranking	474	107
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	93.57
Power efficiency	16.39	14.57
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Xe2 (2025)
GPU code name	GP107	BMG-G21
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2018 (7 years ago)	16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2560
Core clock speed	1177 MHz	2670 MHz
Boost clock speed	1443 MHz	2670 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	46.18	427.2
Floating-point processing power	1.478 TFLOPS	13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	80
TMUs	32	160
Tensor Cores	no data	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	145 mm	272 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	456.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.4
CUDA	6.1	-
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P620 9.42

Arc B580 39.77
+322%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3660

Arc B580 15448
+322%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	48 −160%	125 +160%
1440p	16−18 −338%	70 +338%
4K	9−10 −367%	42 +367%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	1.99
1440p	no data	3.56
4K	no data	5.93

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

16−18

−741%

143
+741%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −242%	100−110 +242%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −588%	117 +588%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −305%	150−160 +305%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −329%	100−110 +329%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −269%	95−100 +269%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −212%	75−80 +212%
Valorant	35−40 −347%	160−170 +347%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −242%	100−110 +242%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −512%	104 +512%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −308%	100−110 +308%
Dota 2	90 −289%	350−400 +289%
Far Cry 5	64 −7.8%	69 +7.8%
Fortnite	55−60 −211%	170−180 +211%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −305%	150−160 +305%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −329%	100−110 +329%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −312%	140−150 +312%
Metro Exodus	6 −500%	36 +500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	125 −61.6%	200−210 +61.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −212%	75−80 +212%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −393%	140−150 +393%
Valorant	35−40 −347%	160−170 +347%
World of Tanks	130−140 −101%	270−280 +101%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −242%	100−110 +242%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −459%	95 +459%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −285%	100−105 +285%
Dota 2	83 −322%	350−400 +322%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −154%	95−100 +154%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −305%	150−160 +305%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −329%	100−110 +329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −173%	200−210 +173%
Valorant	35−40 −347%	160−170 +347%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −2500%	24−27 +2500%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −360%	45−50 +360%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −285%	50−55 +285%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −300%	180−190 +300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
World of Tanks	65−70 −275%	250−260 +275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −311%	70−75 +311%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −550%	130−140 +550%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −305%	85−90 +305%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −379%	65−70 +379%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −383%	85−90 +383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −285%	50−55 +285%
Valorant	24−27 −433%	120−130 +433%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −300%	80−85 +300%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1050%	46 +1050%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −368%	130−140 +368%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −333%	24−27 +333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −300%	80−85 +300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −488%	45−50 +488%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −367%	14 +367%
Dota 2	30−35 −294%	130−140 +294%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −445%	60−65 +445%
Fortnite	10−11 −470%	55−60 +470%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 −443%	35−40 +443%
Valorant	9−10 −644%	65−70 +644%

This is how Quadro P620 and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

Arc B580 is 160% faster in 1080p
Arc B580 is 338% faster in 1440p
Arc B580 is 367% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc B580 is 2500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Arc B580 surpassed Quadro P620 in all 45 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.42	39.77
Recency	1 February 2018	16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	190 Watt

Quadro P620 has 375% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 322.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation graphics card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.