RTX A2000 12 GB vs Quadro P5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX A1000 RTX A2000 RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A4000 RTX A4000H RTX A4500 RTX A5000 RTX A5000-8Q RTX A5000-12Q RTX A5500

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 with RTX A2000 12 GB, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5200
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
30.98

RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms P5200 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking185141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data93.42
Power efficiency21.6235.12
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP104GA106
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603328
Core clock speed1556 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1746 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate279.4124.8
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs160104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P5200 30.98
RTX A2000 12 GB 35.21
+13.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5200 12063
RTX A2000 12 GB 13714
+13.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120
−8.3%
130−140
+8.3%
4K48
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.45
4Kno data8.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
−13.1%
95−100
+13.1%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−6.6%
65−70
+6.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
−13.1%
95−100
+13.1%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−9.1%
120−130
+9.1%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−6.6%
65−70
+6.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−4.2%
100−105
+4.2%
Fortnite 130−140
−10.3%
150−160
+10.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−13%
130−140
+13%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−11.8%
95−100
+11.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−12.1%
130−140
+12.1%
Valorant 180−190
−12.3%
210−220
+12.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
−13.1%
95−100
+13.1%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−9.1%
120−130
+9.1%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−6.6%
65−70
+6.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−9.9%
300−310
+9.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Dota 2 130−140
−12.8%
150−160
+12.8%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−4.2%
100−105
+4.2%
Fortnite 130−140
−10.3%
150−160
+10.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−13%
130−140
+13%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−11.8%
95−100
+11.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
−5.8%
110−120
+5.8%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−11.9%
75−80
+11.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−12.1%
130−140
+12.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
−10.2%
130−140
+10.2%
Valorant 180−190
−12.3%
210−220
+12.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−9.1%
120−130
+9.1%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−6.6%
65−70
+6.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Dota 2 130−140
−12.8%
150−160
+12.8%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−4.2%
100−105
+4.2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−13%
130−140
+13%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−11.8%
95−100
+11.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−12.1%
130−140
+12.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Valorant 180−190
−12.3%
210−220
+12.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
−10.3%
150−160
+10.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−13.3%
230−240
+13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−7.1%
60−65
+7.1%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−8.6%
190−200
+8.6%
Valorant 220−230
−11.1%
250−260
+11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−7.6%
85−90
+7.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−8.7%
75−80
+8.7%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−9%
85−90
+9%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
−9.6%
80−85
+9.6%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−12.1%
65−70
+12.1%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Valorant 170−180
−8.6%
190−200
+8.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 90−95
−9.9%
100−105
+9.9%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%

This is how Quadro P5200 and RTX A2000 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 8% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.98 35.21
Recency 21 February 2018 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 70 Watt

Quadro P5200 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A2000 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 13.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation card while RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
vs
Pro Vega 56 Radeon Pro Vega 56
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
vs
PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
vs
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Max-Q
vs
K3000M Quadro K3000M
P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Max-Q
vs
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
P3000 Max-Q Quadro P3000 Max-Q
vs
PRO W7700 PRO W7700
RX 6850 XT Radeon RX 6850 XT
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
GTX 1070 SLI GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
P106-090 P106 090
vs
RTX 2070 Super Mobile RTX 2070 Super Mobile
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
NVS 140M NVS 140M
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
PlayStation 4 GPU 4 GPU
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU Z1 Extreme GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 95 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 146 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5200 or RTX A2000 12 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.