Jetson Nano vs Quadro P500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking680not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code nameGP108GM20B
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 November 2017 (6 years ago)March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256128
Core clock speed1455 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1519 MHz921 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate21.2514.74
Floating-point performance0.7772 gflops0.2358 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x4
Lengthno data70 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz3.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth32.1 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.112 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.0.11.1
CUDA6.15.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 10 Watt

Quadro P500 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson Nano, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P500 and Jetson Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P500 is a mobile workstation card while Jetson Nano is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P500
Quadro P500
NVIDIA Jetson Nano
Jetson Nano

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 26 votes

Rate Quadro P500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Jetson Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.