Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs UHD Graphics 630

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking758not rated
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Power efficiency14.26no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)3 December 2017 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1843584
Core clock speed350 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors189 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate26.45336.0
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs364
TMUs23224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs6x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1031.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 3 December 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 230 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 2 months, and 1433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and Radeon Pro WX 8100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro WX 8100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Radeon Pro WX 8100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3821 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.