GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q MX150 GP107 MX350

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
24.43
+65.4%

P4200 outperforms GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking222356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.3914.02
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104GP107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)3 January 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304768
Core clock speed1227 MHz1493 MHz
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate237.277.76
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPS2.488 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz7 GB/s
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Anselno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+60.7%
56
−60.7%
1440p40−45
+60%
25
−60%
4K27−30
+58.8%
17
−58.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+30.5%
59
−30.5%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+79%
62
−79%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+67.5%
40−45
−67.5%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+88.6%
35−40
−88.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+66.7%
33
−66.7%
Valorant 100−110
+68.3%
60−65
−68.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+57.1%
49
−57.1%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Dota 2 85−90
−5.7%
92
+5.7%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+75%
44
−75%
Fortnite 120−130
+65.8%
76
−65.8%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+94.7%
57
−94.7%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+67.5%
40−45
−67.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+56.4%
55
−56.4%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+247%
19
−247%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+204%
52
−204%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+74.5%
47
−74.5%
Valorant 100−110
+68.3%
60−65
−68.3%
World of Tanks 250−260
+32.1%
190−200
−32.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+83.3%
42
−83.3%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Dota 2 85−90
+1.2%
86
−1.2%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+92.5%
40
−92.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+158%
43
−158%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+67.5%
40−45
−67.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+305%
39
−305%
Valorant 100−110
+68.3%
60−65
−68.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Dota 2 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+87%
21−24
−87%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+75%
100−105
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
World of Tanks 160−170
+67%
100−105
−67%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+75.9%
29
−75.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+185%
26
−185%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+76.3%
35−40
−76.3%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Valorant 65−70
+70%
40−45
−70%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Dota 2 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+69.2%
24−27
−69.2%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+186%
7
−186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+71.1%
45−50
−71.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+159%
17
−159%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Dota 2 40−45
+63%
27−30
−63%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+183%
12
−183%
Fortnite 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+77.3%
21−24
−77.3%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Valorant 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 56
+0%
56
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 54
+0%
54
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 32
+0%
32
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
+0%
9
+0%

This is how Quadro P4200 and GTX 1050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 61% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4200 is 60% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P4200 is 59% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 305% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 6% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 31 test (76%)
  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 24.43 14.77
Recency 21 February 2018 3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 65.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
Millennium G200
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
210 Rev. 2 GeForce 210 Rev. 2
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
vs
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
GT 520M GT 520M
RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
vs
Pro 555X Pro 555X
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
vs
RTX 2060 RTX 2060
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT
vs
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
GeForce 710M GeForce 710M
vs
GTX 1660 Super GTX 1660 Super
FirePro W2100 FirePro W2100
vs
RX 5500 RX 5500
HD 8750M Radeon HD 8750M
vs
HD 7850M HD 7850M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 58 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 867 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 or GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.