Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs Quadro P3200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P3200
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
22.74

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms P3200 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking249210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.7922.49
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU106
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922304
Core clock speed1328 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate172.8198.7
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS6.359 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P3200 22.74
RTX 3000 Mobile 26.25
+15.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P3200 8762
RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+15.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P3200 16619
RTX 3000 Mobile 19879
+19.6%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P3200 45999
RTX 3000 Mobile 50309
+9.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P3200 12555
RTX 3000 Mobile 14842
+18.2%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P3200 82507
RTX 3000 Mobile 91394
+10.8%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro P3200 4356
RTX 3000 Mobile 5589
+28.3%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Quadro P3200 82
+10.4%
RTX 3000 Mobile 74

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Quadro P3200 140
+26.1%
RTX 3000 Mobile 111

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Quadro P3200 126
+11.3%
RTX 3000 Mobile 114

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Quadro P3200 122
+5.5%
RTX 3000 Mobile 116

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Quadro P3200 107
RTX 3000 Mobile 119
+11.2%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Quadro P3200 47
+2.4%
RTX 3000 Mobile 46

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Quadro P3200 59
RTX 3000 Mobile 82
+39%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Quadro P3200 11
RTX 3000 Mobile 12
+12.4%

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Quadro P3200 59
RTX 3000 Mobile 82
+38.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Quadro P3200 82
+10.4%
RTX 3000 Mobile 74

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Quadro P3200 122
+5.5%
RTX 3000 Mobile 116

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Quadro P3200 140
+26.1%
RTX 3000 Mobile 111

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Quadro P3200 126
+11.3%
RTX 3000 Mobile 114

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Quadro P3200 107
RTX 3000 Mobile 119
+11.2%

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Quadro P3200 47
+2.4%
RTX 3000 Mobile 46

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Quadro P3200 10.5
RTX 3000 Mobile 11.8
+12.4%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Quadro P3200 110
RTX 3000 Mobile 158
+43.4%

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Quadro P3200 110
RTX 3000 Mobile 158
+43.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD86
−20.9%
104
+20.9%
4K28
−214%
88
+214%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−16.2%
40−45
+16.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
−18.5%
77
+18.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−14.7%
85−90
+14.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−12.8%
50−55
+12.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−16.2%
40−45
+16.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−13.3%
65−70
+13.3%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−10.2%
150−160
+10.2%
Hitman 3 45−50
−15.2%
50−55
+15.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−12.1%
120−130
+12.1%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−13.3%
65−70
+13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+44.9%
85−90
−44.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−7.1%
100−110
+7.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 88
+54.4%
55−60
−54.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−14.7%
85−90
+14.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−12.8%
50−55
+12.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−16.2%
40−45
+16.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−13.3%
65−70
+13.3%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−10.2%
150−160
+10.2%
Hitman 3 45−50
−15.2%
50−55
+15.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−12.1%
120−130
+12.1%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−13.3%
65−70
+13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−15.6%
85−90
+15.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−12%
55−60
+12%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−7.1%
100−110
+7.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+2.6%
39
−2.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−12.8%
50−55
+12.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−16.2%
40−45
+16.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%
Forza Horizon 4 72
−110%
150−160
+110%
Hitman 3 45−50
−15.2%
50−55
+15.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−12.1%
120−130
+12.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−15.6%
85−90
+15.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−21.7%
56
+21.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−7.1%
100−110
+7.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−13.3%
65−70
+13.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−18.2%
24−27
+18.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−15.4%
150−160
+15.4%
Hitman 3 27−30
−14.8%
30−35
+14.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−14.9%
50−55
+14.9%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−18.4%
55−60
+18.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−22.2%
30−35
+22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−10.6%
140−150
+10.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−15.8%
40−45
+15.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−13%
24−27
+13%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Hitman 3 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−13.6%
130−140
+13.6%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−16.1%
35−40
+16.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−18.5%
30−35
+18.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−15%
21−24
+15%

This is how Quadro P3200 and RTX 3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 21% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 214% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 54% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 110% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is ahead in 69 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.74 26.25
Recency 21 February 2018 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 80 Watt

Quadro P3200 has 6.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 15.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 296 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 288 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.