GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Quadro P3200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 with GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P3200
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
22.74

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms P3200 by a whopping 239% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking24911
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.29
Power efficiency20.7911.74
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP104GA102
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179210752
Core clock speed1328 MHz1560 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHz1860 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate172.8625.0
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS40 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs112336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount6 GB24 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P3200 22.74
RTX 3090 Ti 77.08
+239%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P3200 8762
RTX 3090 Ti 29703
+239%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P3200 16619
RTX 3090 Ti 69481
+318%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P3200 12555
RTX 3090 Ti 53110
+323%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P3200 82507
RTX 3090 Ti 246319
+199%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P3200 419543
RTX 3090 Ti 564087
+34.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD86
−164%
227
+164%
1440p40−45
−270%
148
+270%
4K28
−289%
109
+289%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.81
1440pno data13.51
4Kno data18.34

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−492%
219
+492%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
−143%
150−160
+143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−310%
160
+310%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−225%
240−250
+225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−155%
120−130
+155%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−443%
201
+443%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−123%
110−120
+123%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−220%
190−200
+220%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−80.3%
240−250
+80.3%
Hitman 3 45−50
−180%
120−130
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−157%
270−280
+157%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−96.2%
150−160
+96.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−105%
120−130
+105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
−158%
300−350
+158%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−55.6%
150−160
+55.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 88
−79.5%
150−160
+79.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−254%
138
+254%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−225%
240−250
+225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−155%
120−130
+155%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−368%
173
+368%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−123%
110−120
+123%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−220%
190−200
+220%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−80.3%
240−250
+80.3%
Hitman 3 45−50
−180%
120−130
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−157%
270−280
+157%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−96.2%
150−160
+96.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−105%
120−130
+105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−332%
300−350
+332%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−238%
160−170
+238%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−55.6%
150−160
+55.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−215%
123
+215%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−155%
120−130
+155%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−311%
152
+311%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−123%
110−120
+123%
Forza Horizon 4 72
−243%
240−250
+243%
Hitman 3 45−50
−180%
120−130
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−157%
270−280
+157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−332%
300−350
+332%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−320%
193
+320%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−31.3%
130
+31.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−105%
120−130
+105%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−277%
160−170
+277%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−220%
110−120
+220%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−283%
90−95
+283%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−391%
108
+391%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−215%
80−85
+215%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−643%
104
+643%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−223%
80−85
+223%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−108%
270−280
+108%
Hitman 3 27−30
−319%
110−120
+319%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−332%
200−210
+332%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−365%
220−230
+365%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−433%
140−150
+433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−81.8%
240−250
+81.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−221%
120−130
+221%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−283%
85−90
+283%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−283%
65−70
+283%
Hitman 3 18−20
−283%
65−70
+283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−91.5%
220−230
+91.5%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−412%
120−130
+412%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−518%
173
+518%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−371%
65−70
+371%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−508%
73
+508%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−300%
50−55
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−960%
53
+960%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−368%
140−150
+368%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−367%
120−130
+367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−600%
70
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−345%
85−90
+345%

This is how Quadro P3200 and RTX 3090 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3090 Ti is 164% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3090 Ti is 270% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3090 Ti is 289% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3090 Ti is 960% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3090 Ti surpassed Quadro P3200 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.74 77.08
Recency 21 February 2018 27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 450 Watt

Quadro P3200 has 500% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090 Ti, on the other hand, has a 239% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 296 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 3303 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.