T600 vs Quadro P3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 with T600, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P3200
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
22.74
+35.4%

P3200 outperforms T600 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking249323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.7928.78
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792640
Core clock speed1328 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHz1335 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate172.853.40
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs11240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P3200 22.74
+35.4%
T600 16.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P3200 8762
+35.4%
T600 6471

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P3200 16619
+91.2%
T600 8694

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P3200 45999
T600 344838
+650%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P3200 12555
+91.6%
T600 6552

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P3200 82507
+102%
T600 40917

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P3200 34195
+22.9%
T600 27828

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P3200 419543
+37.7%
T600 304731

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P3200 35810
+37.9%
T600 25964

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P3200 27741
+4.3%
T600 26600

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD86
+62.3%
53
−62.3%
1440p30−35
+20%
25
−20%
4K28
+40%
20
−40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
+71.1%
35−40
−71.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+39.3%
27−30
−39.3%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+36.4%
55−60
−36.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+38.2%
30−35
−38.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+28%
100−110
−28%
Hitman 3 45−50
+43.8%
30−35
−43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+28.9%
80−85
−28.9%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+38.6%
55−60
−38.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+30.4%
45−50
−30.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+135%
55−60
−135%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+19.3%
80−85
−19.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 88
+132%
35−40
−132%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+39.3%
27−30
−39.3%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+36.4%
55−60
−36.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+38.2%
30−35
−38.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+28%
100−110
−28%
Hitman 3 45−50
+43.8%
30−35
−43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+28.9%
80−85
−28.9%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+38.6%
55−60
−38.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+30.4%
45−50
−30.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+51%
51
−51%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+28.2%
35−40
−28.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+19.3%
80−85
−19.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+5.3%
35−40
−5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+39.3%
27−30
−39.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+38.2%
30−35
−38.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%
Forza Horizon 4 72
−48.6%
100−110
+48.6%
Hitman 3 45−50
+43.8%
30−35
−43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+174%
39
−174%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+71.1%
45
−71.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+70.4%
27
−70.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+19.3%
80−85
−19.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+30.4%
45−50
−30.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+37.5%
30−35
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+44.4%
90−95
−44.4%
Hitman 3 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+74.1%
27
−74.1%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+53.1%
32
−53.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+29.4%
100−110
−29.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Hitman 3 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+38.8%
85−90
−38.8%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+75%
16
−75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+50%
18
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%

This is how Quadro P3200 and T600 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is 62% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P3200 is 20% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P3200 is 40% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 174% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T600 is 49% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • T600 is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.74 16.79
Recency 21 February 2018 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 40 Watt

Quadro P3200 has a 35.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the T600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation card while T600 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
NVIDIA T600
T600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 296 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 681 vote

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.