Radeon Pro 450 vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	319	549
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	15.62	14.06
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GP104	Baffin
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	30 October 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	640
Core clock speed	1088 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,200 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	97.20	32.00
Floating-point processing power	3.11 TFLOPS	1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	80	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1753 MHz	1270 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168 GB/s	81.28 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	-	+
Optimus	+	-
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P3000 Mobile 16.81
+138%

Pro 450 7.06

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3000 Mobile 6484
+138%

Pro 450 2722

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P3000 Mobile 12105
+169%

Pro 450 4502

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

P3000 Mobile 33390
+134%

Pro 450 14245

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P3000 Mobile 9256
+185%

Pro 450 3252

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

P3000 Mobile 63332
+194%

Pro 450 21533

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

P3000 Mobile 331998
+65.6%

Pro 450 200518

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

P3000 Mobile 2864
+201%

Pro 450 952

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	63 +152%	25 −152%
4K	29 +52.6%	19 −52.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+182%

10−12

−182%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +139%	18−20 −139%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +256%	9−10 −256%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +215%	20−22 −215%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +160%	14−16 −160%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +182%	10−12 −182%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +181%	16−18 −181%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +160%	20−22 −160%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +161%	45−50 −161%
Hitman 3	35−40 +171%	14−16 −171%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +124%	40−45 −124%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +235%	20−22 −235%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +174%	18−20 −174%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +167%	24−27 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +69.8%	50−55 −69.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +139%	18−20 −139%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +256%	9−10 −256%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +215%	20−22 −215%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +160%	14−16 −160%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +182%	10−12 −182%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +181%	16−18 −181%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +160%	20−22 −160%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +161%	45−50 −161%
Hitman 3	35−40 +171%	14−16 −171%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +124%	40−45 −124%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +235%	20−22 −235%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +174%	18−20 −174%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +167%	24−27 −167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	81 +286%	21−24 −286%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +69.8%	50−55 −69.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +139%	18−20 −139%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +256%	9−10 −256%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +160%	14−16 −160%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +182%	10−12 −182%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +181%	16−18 −181%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +161%	45−50 −161%
Hitman 3	35−40 +171%	14−16 −171%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +124%	40−45 −124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +167%	24−27 −167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	33 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +69.8%	50−55 −69.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+174%

18−20

−174%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +164%	14−16 −164%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +164%	10−12 −164%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +175%	8−9 −175%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +328%	24−27 −328%
Hitman 3	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +160%	14−16 −160%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +414%	7−8 −414%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +680%	5−6 −680%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +156%	45−50 −156%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+167%

12−14

−167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Hitman 3	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 +355%	21−24 −355%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 +450%	4−5 −450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +225%	8−9 −225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+143%

7−8

−143%

This is how P3000 Mobile and Pro 450 compete in popular games:

P3000 Mobile is 152% faster in 1080p
P3000 Mobile is 53% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the P3000 Mobile is 950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, P3000 Mobile surpassed Pro 450 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.81	7.06
Recency	11 January 2017	30 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt