Radeon Pro 570 vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3000 Mobile and Radeon Pro 570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

P3000 Mobile
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.82
+2.3%

P3000 Mobile outperforms Pro 570 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking322330
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.379.39
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Polaris 20
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)5 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801792
Core clock speed1088 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz1105 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate97.20123.8
Floating-point processing power3.11 TFLOPS3.96 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs80112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth168 GB/s217.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P3000 Mobile 16.82
+2.3%
Pro 570 16.44

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3000 Mobile 6482
+2.3%
Pro 570 6336

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
4K28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+9.1%
110−120
−9.1%
Hitman 3 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+4.4%
90−95
−4.4%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+3.1%
65−70
−3.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+5.9%
85−90
−5.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+9.1%
110−120
−9.1%
Hitman 3 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+4.4%
90−95
−4.4%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+3.1%
65−70
−3.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+8%
75−80
−8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+5.9%
85−90
−5.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+9.1%
110−120
−9.1%
Hitman 3 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+4.4%
90−95
−4.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+10%
30−33
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+5.9%
85−90
−5.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+7%
100−105
−7%
Hitman 3 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+4.5%
110−120
−4.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+5.3%
95−100
−5.3%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

This is how P3000 Mobile and Pro 570 compete in popular games:

  • P3000 Mobile is 7% faster in 1080p
  • P3000 Mobile is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.82 16.44
Recency 11 January 2017 5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 120 Watt

P3000 Mobile has a 2.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 60% lower power consumption.

Pro 570, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P3000 Mobile and Radeon Pro 570.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 159 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 54 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.