GeForce GTX 750 vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3000 Mobile with GeForce GTX 750, including specs and performance data.

P3000 Mobile
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.90
+94.7%

P3000 Mobile outperforms GTX 750 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking318489
Place by popularitynot in top-10095
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.37
Power efficiency15.6710.97
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGP104GM107
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)18 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280512
Core clock speed1088 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rate97.2034.72
Floating-point processing power3.11 TFLOPS1.111 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs8032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth168 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Display Port1.4no data
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
Optimus+-
3D Vision Live-+
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P3000 Mobile 16.90
+94.7%
GTX 750 8.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3000 Mobile 6520
+94.7%
GTX 750 3348

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P3000 Mobile 9256
+133%
GTX 750 3970

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
+113%
30−35
−113%
4K31
+121%
14−16
−121%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+110%
30−33
−110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+100%
60−65
−100%
Hitman 3 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+109%
45−50
−109%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+100%
45−50
−100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+110%
30−33
−110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+100%
60−65
−100%
Hitman 3 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+109%
45−50
−109%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+103%
40−45
−103%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+100%
45−50
−100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+100%
60−65
−100%
Hitman 3 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+109%
45−50
−109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+106%
16−18
−106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+100%
45−50
−100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+106%
18−20
−106%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+114%
50−55
−114%
Hitman 3 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+109%
55−60
−109%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Hitman 3 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+100%
50−55
−100%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+120%
10−11
−120%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%

This is how P3000 Mobile and GTX 750 compete in popular games:

  • P3000 Mobile is 113% faster in 1080p
  • P3000 Mobile is 121% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.90 8.68
Recency 11 January 2017 18 February 2014
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 55 Watt

P3000 Mobile has a 94.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 750, on the other hand, has 36.4% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GeForce GTX 750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 154 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2287 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.