Radeon Pro 5700 vs Quadro P2200

Place in the ranking	230	179
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	22.45	16.46
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GP106	Navi 10
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	10 June 2019 (5 years ago)	4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	2304
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1243 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	119.4	194.4
Floating-point processing power	3.822 TFLOPS	6.221 TFLOPS
ROPs	40	64
TMUs	80	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	201 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	160 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1251 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	200.2 GB/s	384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2200 24.16

Pro 5700 30.70
+27.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2200 9320

Pro 5700 11844
+27.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.16	30.70
Recency	10 June 2019	4 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	130 Watt

Quadro P2200 has 73.3% lower power consumption.

Pro 5700, on the other hand, has a 27.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2200 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.