Radeon Pro W5700X vs Quadro NVS 140M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 140M with Radeon Pro W5700X, including specs and performance data.

NVS 140M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 10 Watt
0.20

Pro W5700X outperforms NVS 140M by a whopping 22700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking138974
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.46
Power efficiency1.3915.51
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameG86Navi 10
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)11 December 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162304
Core clock speed400 MHz1243 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2040 MHz
Number of transistors210 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt205 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200293.8
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS9.4 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno dataQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 140M 0.20
Pro W5700X 45.60
+22700%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 140M 78
Pro W5700X 17590
+22451%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6
−22400%
1350−1400
+22400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data0.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−22400%
450−500
+22400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−21567%
650−700
+21567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−22400%
450−500
+22400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−22400%
450−500
+22400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−22400%
900−950
+22400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−22400%
1800−1850
+22400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−22400%
900−950
+22400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−22579%
6350−6400
+22579%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−21567%
650−700
+21567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−22400%
450−500
+22400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−22400%
450−500
+22400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−22400%
900−950
+22400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−22400%
1800−1850
+22400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−22400%
900−950
+22400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−22678%
2050−2100
+22678%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−22579%
6350−6400
+22579%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−21567%
650−700
+21567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−22400%
450−500
+22400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−22400%
450−500
+22400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−22400%
900−950
+22400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−22400%
1800−1850
+22400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−22400%
900−950
+22400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−22678%
2050−2100
+22678%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−22579%
6350−6400
+22579%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−22400%
1350−1400
+22400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−22400%
450−500
+22400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−22400%
450−500
+22400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−21900%
220−230
+21900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−22400%
450−500
+22400%

This is how NVS 140M and Pro W5700X compete in popular games:

  • Pro W5700X is 22400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 45.60
Recency 9 May 2007 11 December 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 205 Watt

NVS 140M has 1950% lower power consumption.

Pro W5700X, on the other hand, has a 22700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W5700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 140M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 140M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Pro W5700X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
Quadro NVS 140M
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
Radeon Pro W5700X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 140M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 14 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.