GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Quadro NVS 140M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro NVS 110M Quadro NVS 120M Quadro NVS 130M Quadro NVS 135M Quadro NVS 140M Quadro NVS 150M Quadro NVS 160M
VS
MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 140M with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

NVS 140M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 10 Watt
0.20

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms NVS 140M by a whopping 9240% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

NVS 140M NVS 140M
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1391296
Place by popularitynot in top-10020
Power efficiency1.3728.45
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG86GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed400 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1477 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20094.53
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6
−600%
42
+600%
1440p-0−134
4K-0−125

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2350%
49
+2350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1300%
40−45
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
42
+2000%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1000%
44
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1038%
90−95
+1038%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1425%
60−65
+1425%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−214%
85−90
+214%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1300%
40−45
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1400%
30
+1400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−975%
43
+975%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1038%
90−95
+1038%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1450%
62
+1450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−367%
40−45
+367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−214%
85−90
+214%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1300%
40−45
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1150%
25
+1150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−875%
39
+875%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1038%
90−95
+1038%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1275%
55
+1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−267%
33
+267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+55.6%
18
−55.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 10−12
Hitman 3 6−7
−267%
21−24
+267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 9−10

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+0%
42
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+0%
21
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how NVS 140M and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 600% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the NVS 140M is 56% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 2350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • NVS 140M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 28 tests (40%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.20 18.68
Recency 9 May 2007 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 45 Watt

NVS 140M has 350% lower power consumption.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 9240% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 140M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 140M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
Quadro NVS 140M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
FX 360M Quadro FX 360M
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
HD 8970M Crossfire Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
NVS 150M Quadro NVS 150M
Go 6100 GeForce Go 6100
vs
RX 7700 XT Radeon RX 7700 XT
Go 7300 GeForce Go 7300
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4800 GeForce4 Ti 4800
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
vs
ATI HD 3870 Radeon HD 3870
ATI HD 4200 Radeon HD 4200
vs
RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE
ATI Mobility HD 3470 Hybrid X2 Mobility Radeon HD 3470 Hybrid X2
vs
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
GeForce 310M GeForce 310M
vs
ATI X600 XT Radeon X600 XT
8600M GT GeForce 8600M GT
vs
RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 3
ATI Mobility HD 5450 Mobility Radeon HD 5450
vs
GT 430 PCI GeForce GT 430 PCI
9600M GT GeForce 9600M GT
vs
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
vs
HD 6450 GDDR5 Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 8 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 140M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2197 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.