FirePro W8100 vs Quadro M5000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5000M with FirePro W8100, including specs and performance data.

M5000M
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
18.19

W8100 outperforms M5000M by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking298289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.605.98
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGM204Hawaii
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date18 August 2015 (9 years ago)23 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,5362560
Core clock speed975 MHz824 MHz
Boost clock speed1051 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate93.60131.8
Floating-point processing power2.995 TFLOPS4.219 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs96160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s320 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
Display Port1.2no data
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+
HD сomponent video output-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M5000M 18.19
FirePro W8100 19.00
+4.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M5000M 7019
FirePro W8100 7332
+4.5%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

M5000M 22846
FirePro W8100 34705
+51.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85
+0%
85−90
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−2.3%
90−95
+2.3%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−2.3%
90−95
+2.3%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 126
−3.2%
130−140
+3.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−2.3%
90−95
+2.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−2%
100−105
+2%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−1.9%
110−120
+1.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−3.3%
95−100
+3.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how M5000M and FirePro W8100 compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.19 19.00
Recency 18 August 2015 23 June 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 220 Watt

M5000M has an age advantage of 1 year, and 120% lower power consumption.

FirePro W8100, on the other hand, has a 4.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro M5000M and FirePro W8100.

Be aware that Quadro M5000M is a mobile workstation card while FirePro W8100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Quadro M5000M
AMD FirePro W8100
FirePro W8100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 138 votes

Rate Quadro M5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate FirePro W8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.