Radeon RX 7700S vs Quadro M1000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M1000M with Radeon RX 7700S, including specs and performance data.

M1000M
2015
2 GB/4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
7.41

RX 7700S outperforms M1000M by a whopping 438% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking546114
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.54no data
Power efficiency12.7027.31
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 33
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date18 August 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$200.89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speed993 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1072 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate31.78320.0
Floating-point processing power1.017 TFLOPS20.48 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB/4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

M1000M 7.41
RX 7700S 39.84
+438%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M1000M 2849
RX 7700S 15314
+438%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

M1000M 4230
RX 7700S 37918
+797%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

M1000M 3498
RX 7700S 24246
+593%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
−192%
114
+192%
1440p10−12
−470%
57
+470%
4K13
−223%
42
+223%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.15no data
1440p20.09no data
4K15.45no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−529%
88
+529%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−327%
120−130
+327%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−443%
76
+443%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−491%
130
+491%
Fortnite 40−45
−283%
160−170
+283%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−361%
140−150
+361%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−541%
100−110
+541%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−488%
140−150
+488%
Valorant 75−80
−191%
210−220
+191%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−327%
120−130
+327%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−386%
68
+386%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−148%
270−280
+148%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Dota 2 50−55
−165%
140−150
+165%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−459%
123
+459%
Fortnite 40−45
−283%
160−170
+283%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−361%
140−150
+361%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−541%
100−110
+541%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−432%
133
+432%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−569%
85−90
+569%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−488%
140−150
+488%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−674%
147
+674%
Valorant 75−80
−191%
210−220
+191%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−327%
120−130
+327%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−264%
51
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Dota 2 50−55
−165%
140−150
+165%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−432%
117
+432%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−361%
140−150
+361%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−541%
100−110
+541%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−488%
140−150
+488%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−664%
84
+664%
Valorant 75−80
−191%
210−220
+191%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−283%
160−170
+283%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−379%
250−260
+379%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−644%
67
+644%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−671%
50−55
+671%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−349%
170−180
+349%
Valorant 75−80
−218%
250−260
+218%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−600%
40−45
+600%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−479%
81
+479%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−550%
100−110
+550%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−527%
65−70
+527%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−593%
95−100
+593%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−278%
68
+278%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1550%
30−35
+1550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−514%
43
+514%
Valorant 35−40
−543%
220−230
+543%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−867%
55−60
+867%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Dota 2 24−27
−328%
100−110
+328%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−457%
39
+457%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−527%
65−70
+527%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−586%
45−50
+586%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how M1000M and RX 7700S compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700S is 192% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700S is 470% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700S is 223% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7700S is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7700S is ahead in 66 tests (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.41 39.84
Recency 18 August 2015 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB/4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 100 Watt

M1000M has 150% lower power consumption.

RX 7700S, on the other hand, has a 437.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700S is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M1000M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7700S is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Quadro M1000M
AMD Radeon RX 7700S
Radeon RX 7700S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 580 votes

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 124 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M1000M or Radeon RX 7700S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.