GeForce RTX 4080 vs Quadro M1000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M1000M with GeForce RTX 4080, including specs and performance data.

M1000M
2015
2 GB/4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
7.39

RTX 4080 outperforms M1000M by a whopping 1116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5353
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.0329.01
Power efficiency12.6719.25
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM107AD103
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date18 August 2015 (9 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$200.89 $1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4080 has 620% better value for money than M1000M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5129728
Core clock speed993 MHz2205 MHz
Boost clock speed1072 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate31.78761.5
Floating-point processing power1.017 TFLOPS48.74 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs32304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB/4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s716.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.08.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M1000M 7.39
RTX 4080 89.84
+1116%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M1000M 2847
RTX 4080 34617
+1116%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

M1000M 4230
RTX 4080 86267
+1940%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

M1000M 3498
RTX 4080 57903
+1556%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

M1000M 23422
RTX 4080 185431
+692%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

M1000M 31
RTX 4080 310
+911%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

M1000M 59
RTX 4080 120
+102%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

M1000M 31
+38.2%
RTX 4080 23

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

M1000M 37
RTX 4080 225
+502%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

M1000M 34
RTX 4080 114
+236%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

M1000M 12
RTX 4080 199
+1558%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

M1000M 20
RTX 4080 319
+1461%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

M1000M 2
RTX 4080 58
+3324%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
−498%
239
+498%
1440p12−14
−1283%
166
+1283%
4K13
−731%
108
+731%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.025.02
1440p16.747.22
4K15.4511.10

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1825%
231
+1825%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−863%
180−190
+863%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−2520%
262
+2520%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−1009%
240−250
+1009%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1825%
231
+1825%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−594%
110−120
+594%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−857%
200−210
+857%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−445%
260−270
+445%
Hitman 3 14−16
−821%
120−130
+821%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−635%
300−350
+635%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−638%
150−160
+638%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−520%
120−130
+520%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−1516%
400−450
+1516%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−180%
150−160
+180%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−863%
180−190
+863%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−2070%
217
+2070%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−1009%
240−250
+1009%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1650%
210
+1650%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−594%
110−120
+594%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−857%
200−210
+857%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−445%
260−270
+445%
Hitman 3 14−16
−821%
120−130
+821%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−635%
300−350
+635%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−638%
150−160
+638%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−520%
120−130
+520%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−1948%
512
+1948%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
−232%
200−210
+232%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−180%
150−160
+180%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−863%
180−190
+863%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−1790%
189
+1790%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1483%
190
+1483%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−594%
110−120
+594%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−445%
260−270
+445%
Hitman 3 14−16
−821%
120−130
+821%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−821%
396
+821%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−1820%
480
+1820%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−2255%
259
+2255%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−198%
164
+198%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−520%
120−130
+520%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−1086%
160−170
+1086%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−918%
110−120
+918%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1486%
110−120
+1486%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−5000%
153
+5000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1071%
80−85
+1071%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4200%
129
+4200%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−833%
80−85
+833%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−904%
270−280
+904%
Hitman 3 10−12
−1091%
130−140
+1091%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1975%
332
+1975%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1763%
149
+1763%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−6400%
390
+6400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2629%
191
+2629%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−411%
240−250
+411%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−892%
120−130
+892%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1367%
85−90
+1367%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1280%
65−70
+1280%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1975%
80−85
+1975%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−804%
220−230
+804%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−2740%
140−150
+2740%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−2571%
187
+2571%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1925%
80−85
+1925%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−3233%
100
+3233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1633%
50−55
+1633%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6200%
63
+6200%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2388%
190−200
+2388%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−9650%
195
+9650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−4250%
87
+4250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1486%
110−120
+1486%

This is how M1000M and RTX 4080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 is 498% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 is 1283% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 is 731% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 is 9650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4080 surpassed M1000M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.39 89.84
Recency 18 August 2015 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB/4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 320 Watt

M1000M has 700% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080, on the other hand, has a 1115.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M1000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4080 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Quadro M1000M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 551 vote

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4382 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.