GeForce 810M vs Quadro M1000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M1000M with GeForce 810M, including specs and performance data.

M1000M
2015
2 GB/4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
7.43
+601%

M1000M outperforms GeForce 810M by a whopping 601% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking5011055
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.880.01
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM107GF117
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years ago)24 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$200.89 no data
Current price$706 (3.5x MSRP)$163

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M1000M has 8700% better value for money than GeForce 810M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51248
Core clock speed993 MHz738 MHz
Boost clock speed1072 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate31.785.904
Floating-point performance1,017 gflops141.7 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M1000M and GeForce 810M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB/4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.02.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M1000M 7.43
+601%
GeForce 810M 1.06

Quadro M1000M outperforms GeForce 810M by 601% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M1000M 2868
+598%
GeForce 810M 411

Quadro M1000M outperforms GeForce 810M by 598% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

M1000M 8427
+413%
GeForce 810M 1644

Quadro M1000M outperforms GeForce 810M by 413% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+620%
5−6
−620%
4K12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+567%
12−14
−567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+567%
14−16
−567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+567%
9−10
−567%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+582%
21−24
−582%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+567%
14−16
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+567%
12−14
−567%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+547%
16−18
−547%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+567%
21−24
−567%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+594%
35−40
−594%
Hitman 3 95−100
+579%
14−16
−579%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230−240
+597%
30−35
−597%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+600%
20−22
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 140−150
+567%
21−24
−567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+567%
24−27
−567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+590%
27−30
−590%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+567%
14−16
−567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+567%
9−10
−567%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+582%
21−24
−582%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+567%
14−16
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+567%
12−14
−567%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+547%
16−18
−547%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+567%
21−24
−567%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+594%
35−40
−594%
Hitman 3 95−100
+579%
14−16
−579%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230−240
+597%
30−35
−597%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+600%
20−22
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 140−150
+567%
21−24
−567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+567%
24−27
−567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+584%
19
−584%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+590%
27−30
−590%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+567%
14−16
−567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+567%
9−10
−567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+567%
14−16
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+567%
12−14
−567%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+547%
16−18
−547%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+594%
35−40
−594%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230−240
+597%
30−35
−597%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+567%
24−27
−567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+582%
11
−582%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+590%
27−30
−590%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 140−150
+567%
21−24
−567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+579%
14−16
−579%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+582%
10−12
−582%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+543%
7−8
−543%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+567%
9−10
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+567%
12−14
−567%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+592%
12−14
−592%
Hitman 3 75−80
+582%
10−12
−582%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+588%
16−18
−588%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+588%
8−9
−588%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+543%
7−8
−543%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+592%
12−14
−592%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Hitman 3 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+588%
8−9
−588%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+543%
7
−543%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+588%
8−9
−588%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+588%
8−9
−588%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+588%
8−9
−588%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+543%
7−8
−543%

This is how M1000M and GeForce 810M compete in popular games:

  • M1000M is 620% faster in 1080p
  • M1000M is 1100% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.43 1.06
Recency 2 October 2015 24 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB/4 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

The Quadro M1000M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 810M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M1000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 810M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Quadro M1000M
NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GeForce 810M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 495 votes

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 492 votes

Rate GeForce 810M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.